Atlas Shrugs: Obama, the Racist

Atlas Shrugs: Obama, the Racist

37 votes

atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com — You can avoid evil, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding evil.

  • Total votes over time

    Chart?cht=lxy&chd=t:0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,2,2,2,3,3,3,4,5,5,5,5,6,7,8,11,11,12,12,13,15,16,21,24,24,30,32,37,49,99|0,2,5,8,10,8,10,13,16,18,21,24,27,24,27,29,32,35,37,40,43,40,43,45,48,51,54,56,59,62,64,67,70,72,75,78,81,83,86,89,91,89,91,94,97,100&chxt=x,y&chxl=0:|time|1:|0|7|14|21|28|35&chxp=0,90|1,0,18,37,56,75,94&chco=8bb7fc&chf=bg,s,f0fbff&chg=20,20,1,3&chs=175x100

  • Votes per hour

    Chart?cht=lc&chd=t:110,40,15,20,0,15,0,10,0,5,0,5,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,5&chxt=x,y&chxr=1,0,20&chxl=0:|time|&chxp=0,90&chco=8bb7fc&chf=bg,s,f0fbff&chg=20,20,1,3&chs=175x100

Recently Voted

There have been 0 things submitted from this site.

Recent submissions from this site

Looks like no one's submitted anything else from this site.

Related Content

Looks like no one's found anything related to this video.

    • jdow jdow
    • added 2 months ago (edited 2 months ago)

    This video is just below-the-belt campaign smearing. It has nothing to do with actual issues.

    • (0 Kudos received)

  2. Rubbish...

    • (0 Kudos received)

  3. This doesn't even try to be objective on any level, it's a bunch of book passages without any contex, this hardly is evidence that Obama is a racist. This one of the more amateurish attempts at propaganda I have ever seen.

    • (0 Kudos received)

  4. @mortalwind

    I never heard many quips from his book, but my gosh,
    the guy just doesn't get it. He is obsessed about
    race--he is not some post-race candidate at all.

    The people he hangs around are the worst kind of
    racists this country has.

    Not everybody agrees with you.

    As far as the title of the video, it could have been turned
    down a notch, but then again BO has earned all of this through
    all of his own bad choices and words.

    He was certainly quick to want to ban Don Imus from the air,
    but had no problem with Reverend Wright.

    • (0 Kudos received)

  5. Obama a racist?....the guy with a black wife and a white mom.
    Reaching. Really, really reaching.

    • (0 Kudos received)
    • jdow jdow
    • added 2 months ago (edited 2 months ago)

    @Albionshores
    The Republican strategy is to attack people on their strengths. John Kerry was a decorated veteran so they attacked his military service. Obama is African American so they will attack him on race. It's the lowest politics can go...

    • (0 Kudos received)
    • JPress JPress
    • added 2 months ago (edited 2 months ago)

    @Albionshores
    Why did not you mention that his grandma is white too ? Ohh right, because he said that he almost hated his grandma how not liking blacks, or something like that. Google it ;)

    • (0 Kudos received)
  8. Mixx A Mixx administrator removed this comment about 1 month ago.

  9. @jdow

    The point is both sides are low. But as a lifelong Democrat I can safely say
    I am abhorred by the sliminess of BO.

    McCain has been around a hella of long time and is fully vetted. Can't say the same
    for BO.

    In fact he is sleazier than Busch.

    I voted for Kerry, Gore and Clinton.

    I just happen to think Obama is a fraud. Millions more agree with me.

    • (0 Kudos received)
    • jdow jdow
    • added 2 months ago

    @DerivativeRe
    I'm finding it hard to believe you are a Democrat :)

    It seems like you have just one issue: attack Iran.

    McCain is the ultimate flip flopper. He's just a puppet for the neo-cons. Read The Real McCain, it's good:
    http://therealmccain.com/

    • (0 Kudos received)

  11. @JPress He said nothing of the sort about he grandmother! he was relating a story about how his grandmother was somtimes scared by young black men when walking the streets, he never said he almost hated her, I think you should be the one to google it.

    • (0 Kudos received)

  12. @jdow
    Attacking people on their strengths?... really? You can't possibly actually believe that. John Kerry's "war record" was a liability in a national election because of his activities during and after the Vietnam war.

    You pay a price for attacking the US military... throwing your medals away... and then spending decades undermining the whole organization... one of them being that you don't get to be commander and chief of the same organization you've attacked and undermined for decades.

    Go figure. Your statement is like saying some congressmen that gets caught touching children is being attacked on his moral character because he happened to campaign on family values. Any explanations beyond this point will involve crayons and sock puppets.

    As to BO, he's run with a some controversial people. That's just a fact. He wouldn't have disowned several of them already if that were not the case. This is fact. You pay a price for that as well. McCain has made his own mistakes and has, is, and will pay for them as well.

    Neither candidate is worth much in my opinion... it will come down to who sucks less in the end.

    • (0 Kudos received)

  13. @jdow

    Lifelong as well as my parents. LOL, I think that
    my submissions are a lot more diverse that as you
    allege to "Attack Iran."

    And as to the Iranian issue, my submissions are fact and evidenced
    based, to what many in the world think to be the greatest threat
    we have faced since Hitler and the Nazis.

    • (0 Kudos received)

  14. @DerivativeRe

    "And as to the Iranian issue, my submissions are fact and evidenced based."

    Cool, then you won't have a problem providing evidence that:

    •Evidence that the IAEA is unaware of. They say there is no evidence of an active nuclear weapons programme and its Director General has said that Iran should not be attacked.

    •That Ahmadinejad did not take a battering in the polls in a recent gov election (88 seats on elections day out of a possible 260) - the Ahmadinejad is a non argument, he faces a presidential election next year. The Iranians, if left alone, have it covered.

    •Evidence that US weapons inspectors, British Generals and MPs, the Iraqi government are unaware of. They all say that there has been no evidence of the Iranian Republic providing arms to the Iraqi insurgency.

    So, you want to claim that Ahmadinejad is the worst threat since Hitler (not very imaginative, kinda reminisicent of an other's claims and not at all accurate) okey dokey then......

    Evidence please.

    • (0 Kudos received)
    • jdow jdow
    • added 2 months ago

    @DerivativeRe
    Are you saying that the US should go to war with Iran because it's threatening Israel? And you don't want Obama to be president because he might try a more diplomatic solution?

    • (0 Kudos received)

  16. @jdow

    Where did I say anything of the sort? What does support of
    Obama and/or non-support have to do with the global problem
    of Iran developing nuclear weapons?

    • (0 Kudos received)
    • jdow jdow
    • added about 1 month ago

    @DerivativeRe
    I think that's the reason you don't like Obama. You want the US to attack Iran because Ahmadinejad is threatening Israel. You know that McCain is likely to attack Iran, while Obama is more interested in trying diplomacy first. I think you're also worried that Obama is secretly a Muslim.

    Obama would attack Iran if necessary, but his platform is to try diplomacy first:
    http://www.barackobama.com/issues/foreignpolicy/#iran

    • (0 Kudos received)

  18. @jdow

    Why is it that if somebody doesn't support Obama they are demonized like
    you are trying to attempt to do with me?

    Your idiosyncratic and illogical reasoning doesn't make any sense. I think
    you and I have hit a dead-end.

    • (0 Kudos received)
    • jdow jdow
    • added about 1 month ago

    @DerivativeRe
    I'm not demonizing you -- only stating why a self-proclaimed Democrat from a Democratic family is so strongly anti-Obama :)

    • (0 Kudos received)

  20. Cool, then you won't have a problem providing evidence that:

    •Evidence that the IAEA is unaware of. They say there is no evidence of an active nuclear weapons programme and its Director General has said that Iran should not be attacked.

    •That Ahmadinejad did not take a battering in the polls in a recent gov election (88 seats on elections day out of a possible 260) - the Ahmadinejad is a non argument, he faces a presidential election next year. The Iranians, if left alone, have it covered.

    •Evidence that US weapons inspectors, British Generals and MPs, the Iraqi government are unaware of. They all say that there has been no evidence of the Iranian Republic providing arms to the Iraqi insurgency.

    So, you want to claim that Ahmadinejad is the worst threat since Hitler (not very imaginative, kinda reminisicent of an other's claims and not at all accurate) okey dokey then......

    Evidence please.

    • (0 Kudos received)
    • jdow jdow
    • added about 1 month ago

    @Karmashock
    I missed your comment earlier.

    The Vietnam War was a terrible event in history. I don't know the exact details of Kerry's throwing away his medals, and don't really care. It's not for us to judge how a combat veteran deals with what happened over there. Go talk to some Vietnam vets and see how they feel about it and I think you'll find a lot of different opinions. A common theme that I've heard is, "proud to have served my country; disgusted at what happened."

    You wrote, "You pay a price for attacking the US military..." Being against the Vietnam War doesn't mean you are against the USA or its Military. The USA is a free country where people are free to speak their opinions and protest in non-violent ways.

    I don't even like Kerry. I'm just pointing out how the Republicans tend to attack opponents on their strengths.

    • (0 Kudos received)

Login now to post your comment.

Popular Photos on Mixx

View more

Related Stories on Mixx

View more